setup
Set up a new autoresearch experiment interactively. Collects domain, target file, eval command, metric, direction, and evaluator.
Packaged view
This page reorganizes the original catalog entry around fit, installability, and workflow context first. The original raw source lives below.
Install command
npx @skill-hub/cli install alirezarezvani-claude-skills-setup
Repository
Skill path: .gemini/skills/setup
Set up a new autoresearch experiment interactively. Collects domain, target file, eval command, metric, direction, and evaluator.
Open repositoryBest for
Primary workflow: Ship Full Stack.
Technical facets: Full Stack.
Target audience: everyone.
License: Unknown.
Original source
Catalog source: SkillHub Club.
Repository owner: alirezarezvani.
This is still a mirrored public skill entry. Review the repository before installing into production workflows.
What it helps with
- Install setup into Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode workflows
- Review https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills before adding setup to shared team environments
- Use setup for development workflows
Works across
Favorites: 0.
Sub-skills: 0.
Aggregator: No.
Original source / Raw SKILL.md
---
name: "setup"
description: "Set up a new autoresearch experiment interactively. Collects domain, target file, eval command, metric, direction, and evaluator."
command: /ar:setup
---
# /ar:setup — Create New Experiment
Set up a new autoresearch experiment with all required configuration.
## Usage
```
/ar:setup # Interactive mode
/ar:setup engineering api-speed src/api.py "pytest bench.py" p50_ms lower
/ar:setup --list # Show existing experiments
/ar:setup --list-evaluators # Show available evaluators
```
## What It Does
### If arguments provided
Pass them directly to the setup script:
```bash
python {skill_path}/scripts/setup_experiment.py \
--domain {domain} --name {name} \
--target {target} --eval "{eval_cmd}" \
--metric {metric} --direction {direction} \
[--evaluator {evaluator}] [--scope {scope}]
```
### If no arguments (interactive mode)
Collect each parameter one at a time:
1. **Domain** — Ask: "What domain? (engineering, marketing, content, prompts, custom)"
2. **Name** — Ask: "Experiment name? (e.g., api-speed, blog-titles)"
3. **Target file** — Ask: "Which file to optimize?" Verify it exists.
4. **Eval command** — Ask: "How to measure it? (e.g., pytest bench.py, python evaluate.py)"
5. **Metric** — Ask: "What metric does the eval output? (e.g., p50_ms, ctr_score)"
6. **Direction** — Ask: "Is lower or higher better?"
7. **Evaluator** (optional) — Show built-in evaluators. Ask: "Use a built-in evaluator, or your own?"
8. **Scope** — Ask: "Store in project (.autoresearch/) or user (~/.autoresearch/)?"
Then run `setup_experiment.py` with the collected parameters.
### Listing
```bash
# Show existing experiments
python {skill_path}/scripts/setup_experiment.py --list
# Show available evaluators
python {skill_path}/scripts/setup_experiment.py --list-evaluators
```
## Built-in Evaluators
| Name | Metric | Use Case |
|------|--------|----------|
| `benchmark_speed` | `p50_ms` (lower) | Function/API execution time |
| `benchmark_size` | `size_bytes` (lower) | File, bundle, Docker image size |
| `test_pass_rate` | `pass_rate` (higher) | Test suite pass percentage |
| `build_speed` | `build_seconds` (lower) | Build/compile/Docker build time |
| `memory_usage` | `peak_mb` (lower) | Peak memory during execution |
| `llm_judge_content` | `ctr_score` (higher) | Headlines, titles, descriptions |
| `llm_judge_prompt` | `quality_score` (higher) | System prompts, agent instructions |
| `llm_judge_copy` | `engagement_score` (higher) | Social posts, ad copy, emails |
## After Setup
Report to the user:
- Experiment path and branch name
- Whether the eval command worked and the baseline metric
- Suggest: "Run `/ar:run {domain}/{name}` to start iterating, or `/ar:loop {domain}/{name}` for autonomous mode."