thought-leadership
Create thought leadership content including long-form articles, essays, and opinion pieces. Use when the user needs authoritative content, wants to establish expertise, or needs to articulate a unique perspective on industry topics.
Packaged view
This page reorganizes the original catalog entry around fit, installability, and workflow context first. The original raw source lives below.
Install command
npx @skill-hub/cli install az9713-ai-co-writing-claude-skills-thought-leadership
Repository
Skill path: .claude/skills/thought-leadership
Create thought leadership content including long-form articles, essays, and opinion pieces. Use when the user needs authoritative content, wants to establish expertise, or needs to articulate a unique perspective on industry topics.
Open repositoryBest for
Primary workflow: Write Technical Docs.
Technical facets: Full Stack, Tech Writer.
Target audience: everyone.
License: Unknown.
Original source
Catalog source: SkillHub Club.
Repository owner: az9713.
This is still a mirrored public skill entry. Review the repository before installing into production workflows.
What it helps with
- Install thought-leadership into Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode workflows
- Review https://github.com/az9713/ai-co-writing-claude-skills before adding thought-leadership to shared team environments
- Use thought-leadership for development workflows
Works across
Favorites: 0.
Sub-skills: 0.
Aggregator: No.
Original source / Raw SKILL.md
--- name: thought-leadership description: Create thought leadership content including long-form articles, essays, and opinion pieces. Use when the user needs authoritative content, wants to establish expertise, or needs to articulate a unique perspective on industry topics. --- # Thought Leadership Content Creator Create authoritative, perspective-driven content that establishes expertise and shapes conversations in your industry. ## Before Writing 1. **Read context profiles**: - `/context/voice-dna.json` - Maintain authentic voice - `/context/icp.json` - Understand audience sophistication - `/context/business-profile.json` - Align with positioning 2. **Check knowledge base** for supporting content in `/knowledge/` ## What is Thought Leadership? Thought leadership is NOT: - Generic how-to content - Regurgitated industry advice - Safe, consensus opinions - Purely promotional content Thought leadership IS: - Original perspectives on industry topics - Experience-backed insights - Contrarian (but substantiated) takes - Forward-looking predictions - Framework creation - Problem articulation that others haven't voiced ## Content Types ### Type 1: Perspective Piece Share your unique POV on an industry topic ``` STRUCTURE: 1. [SETUP] - The current state or common belief 2. [TENSION] - Why this is problematic/incomplete 3. [YOUR PERSPECTIVE] - Your contrarian or nuanced view 4. [EVIDENCE] - Experience, data, examples 5. [IMPLICATIONS] - What this means for the reader 6. [CALL TO THINK] - Leave them with a new lens ``` ### Type 2: Framework Introduction Create a new way of thinking about a problem ``` STRUCTURE: 1. [PROBLEM] - The messy problem everyone faces 2. [WHY EXISTING SOLUTIONS FAIL] - Gap in current thinking 3. [THE FRAMEWORK] - Your new mental model 4. [COMPONENTS] - Break down the framework 5. [APPLICATION] - How to use it 6. [RESULTS] - What changes when applied ``` ### Type 3: Industry Prediction Share where things are heading ``` STRUCTURE: 1. [CURRENT STATE] - Where we are now 2. [SIGNALS] - What you're seeing that others aren't 3. [PREDICTION] - Where things are going 4. [TIMELINE] - When this will happen 5. [IMPLICATIONS] - What to do about it 6. [YOUR POSITION] - How you're preparing ``` ### Type 4: Lessons from Experience Share hard-won wisdom ``` STRUCTURE: 1. [THE SITUATION] - What you faced 2. [THE STAKES] - Why it mattered 3. [THE MISTAKE/CHALLENGE] - What went wrong or was hard 4. [THE INSIGHT] - What you learned 5. [THE PRINCIPLE] - The generalizable lesson 6. [APPLICATION] - How readers can apply it ``` ### Type 5: State of the Industry Comprehensive analysis of where things stand ``` STRUCTURE: 1. [OVERVIEW] - The big picture 2. [KEY TRENDS] - What's happening 3. [ANALYSIS] - What it means 4. [WINNERS/LOSERS] - Who's positioned well 5. [PREDICTIONS] - Where it's going 6. [RECOMMENDATIONS] - What to do ``` ## Writing Guidelines ### Voice & Tone - Confident but not arrogant - Specific, not vague - Opinionated with reasoning - Accessible to ICP - Personal experiences included ### Structure - Strong opening hook - Clear thesis statement - Logical flow of ideas - Subheadings for navigation - Memorable conclusion ### Evidence Types - Personal experience (primary) - Client/customer stories - Industry data - Historical examples - Logical reasoning - Expert quotes (sparingly) ### Length Guidelines - **LinkedIn article**: 800-1,500 words - **Newsletter essay**: 1,000-2,500 words - **Blog post**: 1,500-3,000 words - **Comprehensive guide**: 3,000-5,000 words ## Content Creation Process ### Step 1: Define the Perspective Ask: - "What's the common belief you're challenging?" - "What's your contrarian or nuanced take?" - "What experience backs this up?" - "What's the 'so what' for the reader?" ### Step 2: Structure the Argument - Lead with the most compelling point - Build logical progression - Address counterarguments - Land with actionable insight ### Step 3: Draft with Voice - Match voice DNA throughout - Include personal stories - Use signature phrases naturally - Maintain energy level ### Step 4: Polish for Impact - Strengthen opening hook - Sharpen key insights - Remove hedging language - Ensure clear takeaways ## Output Format ``` TITLE: [Compelling title] TYPE: [Perspective/Framework/Prediction/Lesson/State of Industry] TARGET LENGTH: [Word count] TARGET PLATFORM: [Where this will be published] --- [FULL ARTICLE CONTENT] --- KEY TAKEAWAYS: 1. [Main point 1] 2. [Main point 2] 3. [Main point 3] SUGGESTED SOCIAL SNIPPETS: - [Quote 1 for social promotion] - [Quote 2 for social promotion] ``` ## Quality Checklist Before delivering: - [ ] Original perspective (not generic advice) - [ ] Clear thesis statement - [ ] Backed by experience/evidence - [ ] Voice matches voice DNA - [ ] Appropriate for ICP sophistication - [ ] Actionable for readers - [ ] Strong opening hook - [ ] Memorable conclusion - [ ] Would establish/reinforce authority ## What to Avoid - Wishy-washy "on the other hand" without taking a stance - Purely theoretical (needs experience backing) - Clickbait promises without substance - Attacking competitors by name - Arrogance or talking down - Generic conclusions everyone agrees with - No clear "so what" for the reader