Back to skills
SkillHub ClubResearch & OpsFull Stack
tasks-planning
Imported from https://github.com/marcos-abreu/connect_kit.
Packaged view
This page reorganizes the original catalog entry around fit, installability, and workflow context first. The original raw source lives below.
Stars
1
Hot score
77
Updated
March 20, 2026
Overall rating
C2.9
Composite score
2.9
Best-practice grade
B81.2
Install command
npx @skill-hub/cli install marcos-abreu-connect-kit-tasks-planning
Repository
marcos-abreu/connect_kit
Skill path: .claude/skills/tasks-planning
Imported from https://github.com/marcos-abreu/connect_kit.
Open repositoryBest for
Primary workflow: Research & Ops.
Technical facets: Full Stack.
Target audience: everyone.
License: Unknown.
Original source
Catalog source: SkillHub Club.
Repository owner: marcos-abreu.
This is still a mirrored public skill entry. Review the repository before installing into production workflows.
What it helps with
- Install tasks-planning into Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode workflows
- Review https://github.com/marcos-abreu/connect_kit before adding tasks-planning to shared team environments
- Use tasks-planning for development workflows
Works across
Claude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLIOpenCode
Favorites: 0.
Sub-skills: 0.
Aggregator: No.
Original source / Raw SKILL.md
---
name: tasks-planning
description: Use during Phase 4 of spec creation to break specification into organized task groups with dependencies - analyzes requirements to determine natural groupings, presents structure for validation, and creates detailed actionable tasks
---
# Tasks Planning
## What It Does
1. Analyzes spec and requirements
2. Determines natural task groupings by layer/skill
3. Presents structure for validation
4. Creates detailed tasks.md with dependencies
5. Notes reusability and visual references
**Tasks are specific, verifiable, and ordered by dependencies.**
## The Process
### Step 1: Load Specification
```bash
SPEC="[provided by workflow]"
cat "$SPEC/spec.md"
cat "$SPEC/planning/requirements.md"
ls -la "$SPEC/planning/visuals/"
```
**Analyze:**
- Requirements and dependencies
- Technical layers (database, API, frontend)
- Existing code to leverage
- Visual designs to implement
### Step 2: Determine Task Groups
Identify natural groupings:
**Common patterns:**
- Database Layer (models, migrations)
- API Layer (controllers, routes, auth)
- Frontend Components (UI, forms, pages)
- Integration & Testing (end-to-end verification)
**Consider dependencies:**
- Database before API (API needs models)
- API before Frontend (Frontend needs endpoints)
- Implementation before Testing
**Present structure:**
```
Based on spec, I'm organizing tasks into:
1. **Database Layer**
- Models, migrations, associations
- Dependencies: None (foundation)
2. **API Layer**
- Controllers, endpoints, auth
- Dependencies: Database Layer
3. **Frontend Components**
- UI, forms, pages
- Dependencies: API Layer
4. **Integration & Testing**
- End-to-end verification
- Dependencies: All implementation
This follows dependency order: foundation → API → interface → verification
Does this grouping make sense, or organize differently?
```
**WAIT for confirmation.**
### Step 3: Present Task Breakdown
After grouping approved:
```
Detailed task breakdown:
## Task Group 1: Database Layer
**Dependencies:** None
- [ ] 1.0 Complete database layer
- [ ] 1.1 Create [Model] with validations
- Fields: [list]
- Validations: [list]
- Reuse pattern from: [existing if applicable]
- [ ] 1.2 Create migration for [table]
- Add indexes for: [fields]
- Foreign keys: [relationships]
- [ ] 1.3 Set up associations
- [Model] has_many [related]
- [Model] belongs_to [parent]
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- Models pass validation tests
- Migrations run successfully
- Associations work correctly
---
## Task Group 2: API Layer
**Dependencies:** Task Group 1
[Similar structure]
---
[Continue for all groups]
Does this breakdown capture all requirements?
```
**WAIT for confirmation.**
### Step 4: Create tasks.md
After breakdown approved:
```bash
cat > "$SPEC/tasks.md" <<'EOF'
# Task Breakdown: [Feature Name]
## Overview
Total Task Groups: [count]
Total Tasks: [count including sub-tasks]
## Task List
### Task Group 1: [Name]
#### Dependencies: [None or previous groups]
- [ ] 1.0 Complete [layer]
- [ ] 1.1 [Implementation task]
- [Specific details]
- [Reuse pattern from: [existing code] if applicable]
- [ ] 1.2 [Implementation task]
- [Specific details]
- [ ] 1.3 [Implementation task]
- [ ] 1.4 [Implementation task]
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [Functional criteria]
- [Technical criteria]
- [Quality criteria]
---
### Task Group 2: [Name]
#### Dependencies: Task Group 1
[Similar structure for each group]
---
## Execution Order
Recommended sequence:
1. Task Group 1: [Name] (Foundation)
2. Task Group 2: [Name] (Builds on 1)
3. Task Group 3: [Name] (Builds on 2)
4. Task Group 4: [Name] (Verification)
## Notes
- Tasks reference specific files/components from spec.md
- Reusability opportunities noted where applicable
- Visual assets referenced in frontend tasks
- Follow TDD: write tests for each component/behavior
EOF
```
### Step 5: Report Completion
```
✅ Task breakdown complete!
Created: tasks.md
Summary:
- [X] task groups by dependencies
- [Y] total tasks
- Execution order defined
- Acceptance criteria for each group
Structure:
- Specific and verifiable tasks
- Dependencies clearly marked
- Reusability notes included
- Visual references added (if applicable)
Ready for Phase 5: Verification
```
**Return to workflow.**
## Task Breakdown Principles
### Grouping Logic
**Group by layer AND skill:**
- Database tasks together (backend skills)
- API tasks together (backend + API design)
- Frontend tasks together (UI/UX + frontend)
- Testing together (integration + QA)
**Respect dependencies:**
- Foundation layers first
- Build progressively
- Verification last
### Task Granularity
**Good task size:** Completable in 1-4 hours
**Too granular:**
- ❌ "Add import statement"
- ❌ "Define variable"
**Too broad:**
- ❌ "Build authentication system"
- ❌ "Create all components"
**Just right:**
- ✅ "Create User model with validations"
- ✅ "Implement login API endpoint"
- ✅ "Build registration form component"
### Testing Approach
**Follow TDD naturally:**
- Write test for behavior
- Implement to pass test
- Refactor while green
- Repeat for next behavior
**Don't specify test counts** - write tests for each:
- Model method
- API endpoint
- UI component behavior
- Integration flow
Subagents following TDD will write appropriate tests.
## Adapting Structure
**API-heavy feature:**
```
1. Database Layer
2. API Endpoints
3. Authentication/Authorization
4. Frontend Integration
5. Integration Testing
```
**UI-heavy feature:**
```
1. Data Layer (if needed)
2. Component Library
3. Page Layouts
4. Interaction Flows
5. Integration Testing
```
**Background job:**
```
1. Data Models
2. Job Logic
3. Queue Configuration
4. Monitoring/Logging
5. Integration Testing
```
**Adapt to feature, but always:**
- Respect dependencies
- Include verification group
- Note reusability
## Red Flags
**Never:**
- Create vague tasks without specifics
- Omit dependencies
- Skip reusability notes when identified
- Forget visual references (if visuals exist)
**Always:**
- Make tasks specific and verifiable
- Note dependencies between groups
- Include reusability references
- Reference visual files in frontend tasks
- Define acceptance criteria per group
## Integration
**Called by:**
- `spec-creation-workflow` (Phase 4)
**Returns to:**
- `spec-creation-workflow`
**Creates:**
- `[spec]/tasks.md`
**Uses:**
- `spec.md` - Requirements and structure
- `planning/requirements.md` - Original requirements
- `planning/visuals/*` - Design assets
**Next phase uses:**
- `tasks.md` for verification