Back to skills
SkillHub ClubShip Full StackFull Stack

ooda

OODA loop decision framework (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act). Use for complex decisions, problem-solving, unclear situations, or when someone is jumping to solutions without analysis.

Packaged view

This page reorganizes the original catalog entry around fit, installability, and workflow context first. The original raw source lives below.

Stars
50
Hot score
91
Updated
March 19, 2026
Overall rating
C2.8
Composite score
2.8
Best-practice grade
A92.0

Install command

npx @skill-hub/cli install neurofoo-agent-skills-ooda

Repository

neurofoo/agent-skills

Skill path: ooda

OODA loop decision framework (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act). Use for complex decisions, problem-solving, unclear situations, or when someone is jumping to solutions without analysis.

Open repository

Best for

Primary workflow: Ship Full Stack.

Technical facets: Full Stack.

Target audience: everyone.

License: Unknown.

Original source

Catalog source: SkillHub Club.

Repository owner: neurofoo.

This is still a mirrored public skill entry. Review the repository before installing into production workflows.

What it helps with

  • Install ooda into Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode workflows
  • Review https://github.com/neurofoo/agent-skills before adding ooda to shared team environments
  • Use ooda for development workflows

Works across

Claude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLIOpenCode

Favorites: 0.

Sub-skills: 0.

Aggregator: No.

Original source / Raw SKILL.md

---
name: ooda
description: OODA loop decision framework (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act). Use for complex decisions, problem-solving, unclear situations, or when someone is jumping to solutions without analysis.
user-invocable: true
---

# OODA Loop Analysis

Run a complete OODA loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Execute) on the problem or decision provided.

## Instructions

Work through each phase sequentially. Be thorough but concise.

### Phase 1: OBSERVE
Gather facts before analyzing. Ask: "What is actually happening?"

Output:
- **Current State**: Facts only, no interpretation
- **Signals**: What prompted this inquiry
- **Scope**: Boundaries of the situation
- **Constraints**: Resources, time, rules, dependencies
- **Unknowns**: Information gaps to acknowledge

### Phase 2: ORIENT
Analyze and build understanding. Ask: "Why is this happening?"

Output:
- **Root Cause Analysis**: Underlying drivers, not just symptoms
- **Mental Models**: Frameworks that apply (first principles, inversion, second-order effects, etc.)
- **Patterns**: Similar situations and their outcomes
- **Stakeholder Views**: How different parties see this
- **Assumptions**: What we're taking for granted
- **Biases**: Cognitive traps to watch for

### Phase 3: DECIDE
Choose from viable options. Ask: "What's the best approach?"

Output:
- **Options** (minimum 3):
  - Option A — Pros / Cons / Risk level
  - Option B — Pros / Cons / Risk level
  - Option C — Pros / Cons / Risk level
- **Recommendation**: Selected approach with rationale
- **Success Criteria**: How we'll know it worked
- **Contingency**: Fallback if primary approach fails

### Phase 4: EXECUTE
Plan implementation with verification. Ask: "How do we act and confirm?"

Output:
- **Action Steps**: Ordered, concrete steps
- **Verification Points**: How to check progress at each stage
- **Timeline**: Realistic schedule
- **First Action**: The immediate next step

### Feedback Loop
End with:
- **Key Risks**: What could derail this
- **Review Trigger**: When to reassess (time or event based)

## Format

Use clear headers for each phase. Be direct and actionable. Avoid fluff.

## Examples

### Business: Product Launch Timing

**Context**: Feature 85% complete, competitor launching similar feature next month.

**OBSERVE**: Core functionality works; edge cases unhandled. Competitor announced similar launch. 3 engineers available; Q4 revenue targets looming.

**ORIENT**: Root tension is first-mover advantage vs. quality reputation. Last rushed launch caused 3-month support burden. Sales wants it now; Support worried; Engineering wants 2 more weeks.

**DECIDE**: Options evaluated—Launch now (high risk), Delay 4 weeks (medium), Soft launch to 10 customers (low risk). Selected: Soft launch → gather feedback → full launch in 3 weeks.

**EXECUTE**: Identify 10 beta customers (2 days) → Deploy with feature flag (1 day) → Monitor 2 weeks → Full launch with case studies.

### Personal: Job Offer Decision

**Context**: 3 years at current company, plateaued. Offer is 30% raise, bigger scope, requires travel.

**OBSERVE**: Current role comfortable but stagnant. New role offers growth but spouse's job isn't portable; young child at home.

**ORIENT**: Root feeling is being undervalued + seeking growth. Models: Regret minimization; total compensation (salary + learning + relationships).

**DECIDE**: Selected transparent conversation with current manager + gather more info on new role before deciding.

**EXECUTE**: List non-negotiables → Career conversation with manager → Talk to future team → 48-hour reflection before final decision.

$ARGUMENTS
ooda | SkillHub