ooda
OODA loop decision framework (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act). Use for complex decisions, problem-solving, unclear situations, or when someone is jumping to solutions without analysis.
Packaged view
This page reorganizes the original catalog entry around fit, installability, and workflow context first. The original raw source lives below.
Install command
npx @skill-hub/cli install neurofoo-agent-skills-ooda
Repository
Skill path: ooda
OODA loop decision framework (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act). Use for complex decisions, problem-solving, unclear situations, or when someone is jumping to solutions without analysis.
Open repositoryBest for
Primary workflow: Ship Full Stack.
Technical facets: Full Stack.
Target audience: everyone.
License: Unknown.
Original source
Catalog source: SkillHub Club.
Repository owner: neurofoo.
This is still a mirrored public skill entry. Review the repository before installing into production workflows.
What it helps with
- Install ooda into Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode workflows
- Review https://github.com/neurofoo/agent-skills before adding ooda to shared team environments
- Use ooda for development workflows
Works across
Favorites: 0.
Sub-skills: 0.
Aggregator: No.
Original source / Raw SKILL.md
--- name: ooda description: OODA loop decision framework (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act). Use for complex decisions, problem-solving, unclear situations, or when someone is jumping to solutions without analysis. user-invocable: true --- # OODA Loop Analysis Run a complete OODA loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Execute) on the problem or decision provided. ## Instructions Work through each phase sequentially. Be thorough but concise. ### Phase 1: OBSERVE Gather facts before analyzing. Ask: "What is actually happening?" Output: - **Current State**: Facts only, no interpretation - **Signals**: What prompted this inquiry - **Scope**: Boundaries of the situation - **Constraints**: Resources, time, rules, dependencies - **Unknowns**: Information gaps to acknowledge ### Phase 2: ORIENT Analyze and build understanding. Ask: "Why is this happening?" Output: - **Root Cause Analysis**: Underlying drivers, not just symptoms - **Mental Models**: Frameworks that apply (first principles, inversion, second-order effects, etc.) - **Patterns**: Similar situations and their outcomes - **Stakeholder Views**: How different parties see this - **Assumptions**: What we're taking for granted - **Biases**: Cognitive traps to watch for ### Phase 3: DECIDE Choose from viable options. Ask: "What's the best approach?" Output: - **Options** (minimum 3): - Option A — Pros / Cons / Risk level - Option B — Pros / Cons / Risk level - Option C — Pros / Cons / Risk level - **Recommendation**: Selected approach with rationale - **Success Criteria**: How we'll know it worked - **Contingency**: Fallback if primary approach fails ### Phase 4: EXECUTE Plan implementation with verification. Ask: "How do we act and confirm?" Output: - **Action Steps**: Ordered, concrete steps - **Verification Points**: How to check progress at each stage - **Timeline**: Realistic schedule - **First Action**: The immediate next step ### Feedback Loop End with: - **Key Risks**: What could derail this - **Review Trigger**: When to reassess (time or event based) ## Format Use clear headers for each phase. Be direct and actionable. Avoid fluff. ## Examples ### Business: Product Launch Timing **Context**: Feature 85% complete, competitor launching similar feature next month. **OBSERVE**: Core functionality works; edge cases unhandled. Competitor announced similar launch. 3 engineers available; Q4 revenue targets looming. **ORIENT**: Root tension is first-mover advantage vs. quality reputation. Last rushed launch caused 3-month support burden. Sales wants it now; Support worried; Engineering wants 2 more weeks. **DECIDE**: Options evaluated—Launch now (high risk), Delay 4 weeks (medium), Soft launch to 10 customers (low risk). Selected: Soft launch → gather feedback → full launch in 3 weeks. **EXECUTE**: Identify 10 beta customers (2 days) → Deploy with feature flag (1 day) → Monitor 2 weeks → Full launch with case studies. ### Personal: Job Offer Decision **Context**: 3 years at current company, plateaued. Offer is 30% raise, bigger scope, requires travel. **OBSERVE**: Current role comfortable but stagnant. New role offers growth but spouse's job isn't portable; young child at home. **ORIENT**: Root feeling is being undervalued + seeking growth. Models: Regret minimization; total compensation (salary + learning + relationships). **DECIDE**: Selected transparent conversation with current manager + gather more info on new role before deciding. **EXECUTE**: List non-negotiables → Career conversation with manager → Talk to future team → 48-hour reflection before final decision. $ARGUMENTS