SkillHub ClubShip Full StackFull Stack

code-reviewer

Imported from https://github.com/omerlefaruk/CasareRPA.

Packaged view

This page reorganizes the original catalog entry around fit, installability, and workflow context first. The original raw source lives below.

Stars

Hot score

Updated

March 20, 2026

Overall rating

C2.0

Composite score

2.0

Best-practice grade

F36.0

Install command

npx @skill-hub/cli install omerlefaruk-casarerpa-code-reviewer

Repository

omerlefaruk/CasareRPA

Skill path: .claude/skills/code-reviewer

Imported from https://github.com/omerlefaruk/CasareRPA.

Open repository

Best for

Primary workflow: Ship Full Stack.

Technical facets: Full Stack.

Target audience: everyone.

License: Unknown.

Original source

Catalog source: SkillHub Club.

Repository owner: omerlefaruk.

This is still a mirrored public skill entry. Review the repository before installing into production workflows.

What it helps with

Install code-reviewer into Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode workflows
Review https://github.com/omerlefaruk/CasareRPA before adding code-reviewer to shared team environments
Use code-reviewer for development workflows

Works across

Claude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLIOpenCode

Favorites: 0.

Sub-skills: 0.

Aggregator: No.

Original source / Raw SKILL.md

---
name: code-reviewer
description: Structured code review output format for the reviewer agent. Provides APPROVED/ISSUES format with file:line references. Use when: reviewing code changes, code quality checks, architecture compliance checks, approving code for merge, identifying critical/major/minor issues.
---

# Code Reviewer

Structured format for code reviews.

## Output Format

### If APPROVED

```markdown
## APPROVED

**Summary**: Brief description of what was reviewed

**Quality**: Good | Excellent
**Tests**: Adequate | Comprehensive
**Security**: No issues found

Proceed to QA phase.
```

### If ISSUES Found

```markdown
## ISSUES

### Critical (Must Fix)
1. **src/file.py:123** - Issue description
   - **Why**: Explanation
   - **Fix**: Suggested solution

### Major (Should Fix)
2. **src/file.py:456** - Issue description

### Minor (Consider)
3. **src/file.py:789** - Issue description
```

## Review Checklist

### Code Quality
- Readable, self-documenting code
- Small, single-responsibility functions (<50 lines)
- No placeholder code (TODO, pass, ...)
- Proper error handling with loguru logging
- Complete type hints on all functions

### Architecture Compliance
- Follows Clean DDD layers
- Dependencies flow inward
- Domain layer has NO external dependencies
- Nodes have logic + visual wrappers separate

### Async Patterns
- All Playwright operations are async
- Consistent async/await usage
- No blocking calls in async functions

## Severity Definitions

| Severity | Definition | Action |
|----------|------------|--------|
| Critical | Breaks functionality, security vulnerability | Must fix |
| Major | Reduces maintainability, missing tests | Should fix |
| Minor | Style, naming improvements | Consider |