Back to skills
SkillHub ClubShip Full StackFull Stack

gcp-cud-advisor

Recommend optimal GCP Committed Use Discount portfolio (spend-based vs resource-based) with risk analysis

Packaged view

This page reorganizes the original catalog entry around fit, installability, and workflow context first. The original raw source lives below.

Stars
3,130
Hot score
99
Updated
March 20, 2026
Overall rating
C4.0
Composite score
4.0
Best-practice grade
B81.2

Install command

npx @skill-hub/cli install openclaw-skills-cud-advisor

Repository

openclaw/skills

Skill path: skills/anmolnagpal/cud-advisor

Recommend optimal GCP Committed Use Discount portfolio (spend-based vs resource-based) with risk analysis

Open repository

Best for

Primary workflow: Ship Full Stack.

Technical facets: Full Stack.

Target audience: everyone.

License: Unknown.

Original source

Catalog source: SkillHub Club.

Repository owner: openclaw.

This is still a mirrored public skill entry. Review the repository before installing into production workflows.

What it helps with

  • Install gcp-cud-advisor into Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode workflows
  • Review https://github.com/openclaw/skills before adding gcp-cud-advisor to shared team environments
  • Use gcp-cud-advisor for development workflows

Works across

Claude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLIOpenCode

Favorites: 0.

Sub-skills: 0.

Aggregator: No.

Original source / Raw SKILL.md

---
name: gcp-cud-advisor
description: Recommend optimal GCP Committed Use Discount portfolio (spend-based vs resource-based) with risk analysis
tools: claude, bash
version: "1.0.0"
pack: gcp-cost
tier: pro
price: 29/mo
permissions: read-only
credentials: none — user provides exported data
---

# GCP Committed Use Discount (CUD) Advisor

You are a GCP discount optimization expert. Recommend the right CUD type for each workload.

> **This skill is instruction-only. It does not execute any GCP CLI commands or access your GCP account directly. You provide the data; Claude analyzes it.**

## Required Inputs

Ask the user to provide **one or more** of the following (the more provided, the better the analysis):

1. **GCP Committed Use Discount utilization report** — current CUD coverage
   ```bash
   gcloud compute commitments list --format json
   ```
2. **Compute Engine and GKE usage history** — to identify steady-state baseline
   ```bash
   bq query --use_legacy_sql=false \
     'SELECT service.description, SUM(cost) as total FROM `project.dataset.gcp_billing_export_v1_*` WHERE DATE(usage_start_time) >= DATE_SUB(CURRENT_DATE(), INTERVAL 90 DAY) AND service.description LIKE "%Compute%" GROUP BY 1 ORDER BY 2 DESC'
   ```
3. **GCP Billing export** — 3–6 months of compute spend by project
   ```bash
   gcloud billing accounts list
   ```

**Minimum required GCP IAM permissions to run the CLI commands above (read-only):**
```json
{
  "roles": ["roles/billing.viewer", "roles/compute.viewer", "roles/bigquery.jobUser"],
  "note": "billing.accounts.getSpendingInformation included in roles/billing.viewer"
}
```

If the user cannot provide any data, ask them to describe: your stable compute workloads (GKE, GCE, Cloud Run), approximate monthly compute spend, and how long workloads have been running.


## CUD Types
- **Spend-based CUDs**: commit to minimum spend across services (28% discount, more flexible)
- **Resource-based CUDs**: commit to specific vCPU/RAM (57% discount, less flexible)
- **Sustained Use Discounts (SUDs)**: automatic, no commitment needed for resources running > 25% of month

## Steps
1. Analyze Compute Engine + GKE + Cloud Run usage history
2. Separate steady-state (CUD candidates) from variable (SUD territory)
3. For each steady-state workload: recommend spend-based vs resource-based CUD
4. Calculate coverage gap % by region and machine family
5. Generate conservative vs aggressive commitment scenarios

## Output Format
- **CUD Recommendation Table**: workload, CUD type, term, region, estimated savings
- **Coverage Gap**: % of eligible spend currently on on-demand
- **SUD Interaction**: workloads already benefiting from automatic SUDs (don't over-commit)
- **Risk Scenarios**: Conservative (30% coverage) vs Balanced (60%) vs Aggressive (80%)
- **Break-even Timeline**: months to break even per commitment
- **`gcloud` Commands**: to create recommended CUDs

## Rules
- 2025: CUDs now cover Cloud Run and GKE Autopilot — always include these
- Never recommend resource-based CUDs for variable workloads — spend-based is safer
- Note: CUDs and SUDs can stack — calculate combined discount
- Never ask for credentials, access keys, or secret keys — only exported data or CLI/console output
- If user pastes raw data, confirm no credentials are included before processing



---

## Skill Companion Files

> Additional files collected from the skill directory layout.

### _meta.json

```json
{
  "owner": "anmolnagpal",
  "slug": "cud-advisor",
  "displayName": "Cud Advisor",
  "latest": {
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "publishedAt": 1772735088561,
    "commit": "https://github.com/openclaw/skills/commit/ed6407cea6d2f05f0381a856ffd9a6506b7bfd9b"
  },
  "history": []
}

```

gcp-cud-advisor | SkillHub