principles
Ray Dalio-inspired personal knowledge system. Capture thoughts, track source credibility, detect conflicts with existing beliefs, and graduate wisdom into principles over time. Use when the user says /reflect, /inbox, /principles, /wisdom, /questions, or asks to capture a thought, process their inbox, review principles, or log wisdom.
Packaged view
This page reorganizes the original catalog entry around fit, installability, and workflow context first. The original raw source lives below.
Install command
npx @skill-hub/cli install openclaw-skills-principles
Repository
Skill path: skills/andyhcwang/principles
Ray Dalio-inspired personal knowledge system. Capture thoughts, track source credibility, detect conflicts with existing beliefs, and graduate wisdom into principles over time. Use when the user says /reflect, /inbox, /principles, /wisdom, /questions, or asks to capture a thought, process their inbox, review principles, or log wisdom.
Open repositoryBest for
Primary workflow: Ship Full Stack.
Technical facets: Full Stack.
Target audience: everyone.
License: Unknown.
Original source
Catalog source: SkillHub Club.
Repository owner: openclaw.
This is still a mirrored public skill entry. Review the repository before installing into production workflows.
What it helps with
- Install principles into Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode workflows
- Review https://github.com/openclaw/skills before adding principles to shared team environments
- Use principles for development workflows
Works across
Favorites: 0.
Sub-skills: 0.
Aggregator: No.
Original source / Raw SKILL.md
---
name: principles
description: "Ray Dalio-inspired personal knowledge system. Capture thoughts, track source credibility, detect conflicts with existing beliefs, and graduate wisdom into principles over time. Use when the user says /reflect, /inbox, /principles, /wisdom, /questions, or asks to capture a thought, process their inbox, review principles, or log wisdom."
---
# Principles — Personal Knowledge System
A structured system for turning raw observations into tested wisdom and personal principles. Inspired by Ray Dalio's "Principles" methodology.
## Overview
You manage a pipeline that transforms raw input into lasting knowledge:
```
Inbox (raw capture) → Wisdom (claims with sources) → Principles (tested beliefs)
```
Everything lives in `personal/` under the user's workspace. Create the directory structure on first use if it doesn't exist.
## Directory Structure
```
personal/
├── _system.md # These instructions (copy from SKILL.md on init)
├── inbox.md # Raw thought capture
├── journal.md # Daily reflections
├── wisdom/
│ └── collected.md # Claims organized by domain
├── principles/
│ ├── _index.md # Master list of all principles
│ ├── life.md # Personal philosophy
│ ├── business.md # Business principles
│ └── leadership.md # Leadership principles
└── open-questions.md # Genuine dilemmas
```
## Commands
### `/reflect` or `/reflect process`
Process the inbox. Parse each thought, check for conflicts, route to the right file.
### `/reflect inbox` or `/inbox`
Add a raw thought to `inbox.md`. User just dumps text — you clean it up later during processing.
### `/reflect wisdom`
Show collected wisdom, optionally filtered by domain.
### `/reflect principles`
Show current principles across all domains.
### `/reflect questions`
Show open questions and their status.
### `/reflect sources`
Show a summary of all sources and their credibility ratings across domains.
### `/reflect journal`
Add a journal entry for today with timestamp.
## Processing Inbox (`/reflect`)
This is the core workflow. When triggered:
1. **Read** `inbox.md`
2. **Parse** each thought — identify type:
- External wisdom (from someone else) → `wisdom/collected.md`
- Personal belief or stance → check against `principles/*.md`
- Factual learning → `wisdom/collected.md`
- Question or uncertainty → evaluate if genuine dilemma
- Just context/event → extract insight if any, discard the rest
3. **Check for conflicts** against existing wisdom claims:
- Same claim, new source → add as corroborating evidence
- Conflicting claim in same domain → **STOP**. Present conflict. Ask user to resolve.
4. **Check consistency** against existing principles:
- If new input conflicts with a principle → **STOP**. Present conflict. Ask user to resolve.
5. **If ANY conflict found** → STOP and ask user:
- Show the conflict clearly
- Offer options: update existing, keep existing, split claims, convert to open question
- Do NOT silently file conflicting information
6. **Route content** based on user decisions
7. **Clean up** `inbox.md` after processing
8. **Update** `principles/_index.md` if new principles were added
## Content Formats
### Wisdom Claims (`wisdom/collected.md`)
Claims are organized by **domain**, not by source. Multiple sources can corroborate the same claim.
```markdown
## [Domain/Aspect]
### [Claim stated plainly]
**Domain**: [category/aspect]
**Confidence**: [Low / Medium / High]
**Sources**:
1. [Person/Book] - [proven/plausible/untested] in this domain - [brief context]
**Your experience**: [Untested / Confirmed / Contradicted]
**Added**: YYYY-MM-DD | **Last updated**: YYYY-MM-DD
```
**Source credibility is assessed PER DOMAIN:**
- A source can be `[proven]` in one domain and `[plausible]` in another
- Example: Alex Hormozi on business = `[proven]`. Alex Hormozi on health = `[plausible]`.
- Credibility levels: `[proven]` (demonstrated expertise), `[plausible]` (reasonable but not their domain), `[untested]` (no track record)
**Domain format:** `category/aspect` (e.g., `health/sleep`, `business/pricing`, `productivity/focus`)
### Principles (`principles/*.md`)
```markdown
## [Principle stated as a clear belief]
**Confidence**: [certain / hypothesis / exploring]
**Added**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Context**: Why you believe this
**Reasoning**: Evidence and experience supporting it
**Related**: Links to related principles or wisdom claims
```
### Open Questions (`open-questions.md`)
Only genuine dilemmas — not todo items or simple unknowns.
```markdown
## [Question]
**Status**: [exploring / gathering-evidence / leaning-toward-X]
**Goal**: What are you actually trying to achieve?
**Problem**: What's blocking it?
**Options**:
1. [Option A] - pros/cons
2. [Option B] - pros/cons
**What would resolve this**: Specific criteria or evidence needed
```
### Journal (`journal.md`)
Append-only daily entries:
```markdown
## YYYY-MM-DD
[Observations, reflections, what happened today]
```
## Graduation: Wisdom → Principles
When a wisdom claim reaches **High confidence** (multiple credible sources + personal experience confirms it), prompt the user:
> "This claim has strong evidence and you've confirmed it personally. Want to graduate it to a principle in [domain]?"
If yes, create the principle entry and cross-reference it.
## Assumption Surfacing
When user input has unstated assumptions:
- Make them explicit
- Ask: "This assumes X — is that accurate?"
- Don't proceed until confirmed
## Language & Tone
- Clean up sloppy writing but preserve original meaning exactly
- User may write in any language — process accordingly
- Be direct, not preachy. This is a tool, not a lecture.
## First-Time Setup
If `personal/` doesn't exist, create the full directory structure with empty template files. Tell the user:
> "Set up your principles system. Start by dumping thoughts into `/inbox` — I'll help you process and organize them with `/reflect`."
---
## Skill Companion Files
> Additional files collected from the skill directory layout.
### _meta.json
```json
{
"owner": "andyhcwang",
"slug": "principles",
"displayName": "Principles",
"latest": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"publishedAt": 1770883531804,
"commit": "https://github.com/openclaw/skills/commit/ddc4cef76eea1f600237e15debb46bb113acfa36"
},
"history": []
}
```