Back to results

Filtered result set

64 / 2280 matches

SkillHub ClubWrite Technical DocsTech WriterFull StackTesting

bug-reporting-excellence

This skill provides a structured template and guidelines for writing effective bug reports. It includes specific title formulas, severity definitions, required information fields, and concrete examples. The skill integrates with quality analysis agents for automated triage and duplicate detection.

Packaged view

This page reorganizes the original catalog entry around fit, installability, and workflow context first. The original raw source lives below.

Stars
262
Hot score
98
Updated
March 20, 2026
Overall rating
A8.5
Composite score
7.2
Best-practice grade
S96.0

Install command

npx @skill-hub/cli install proffesor-for-testing-agentic-qe-bug-reporting-excellence
bug-reportingquality-assurancetechnical-writingtriage

Repository

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Skill path: .claude/skills/bug-reporting-excellence

This skill provides a structured template and guidelines for writing effective bug reports. It includes specific title formulas, severity definitions, required information fields, and concrete examples. The skill integrates with quality analysis agents for automated triage and duplicate detection.

Open repository

Best for

Primary workflow: Write Technical Docs.

Technical facets: Tech Writer, Full Stack, Testing.

Target audience: Quality engineers, testers, developers, and product managers who need to report or triage software defects.

License: Unknown.

Original source

Catalog source: SkillHub Club.

Repository owner: proffesor-for-testing.

This is still a mirrored public skill entry. Review the repository before installing into production workflows.

What it helps with

  • Install bug-reporting-excellence into Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode workflows
  • Review https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe before adding bug-reporting-excellence to shared team environments
  • Use bug-reporting-excellence for communication workflows

Works across

Claude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLIOpenCode

Favorites: 0.

Sub-skills: 0.

Aggregator: No.

Original source / Raw SKILL.md

---
name: bug-reporting-excellence
description: "Write high-quality bug reports that get fixed quickly. Use when reporting bugs, training teams on bug reporting, or establishing bug report standards."
category: quality-communication
priority: high
tokenEstimate: 900
agents: [qe-quality-analyzer, qe-production-intelligence, qe-flaky-test-hunter]
implementation_status: optimized
optimization_version: 1.0
last_optimized: 2025-12-03
dependencies: []
quick_reference_card: true
tags: [bugs, reporting, communication, triage, quality]
---

# Bug Reporting Excellence

<default_to_action>
When reporting bugs:
1. TITLE: `[Component] fails [Condition] causing [Impact]`
2. DESCRIBE: Expected behavior → Actual behavior → Steps to reproduce
3. INCLUDE: Environment, severity, screenshots/logs, business impact
4. ISOLATE: Narrow down conditions (browser, user, amount thresholds)
5. ONE BUG = ONE REPORT (don't combine issues)

**Bug Report Formula:**
```markdown
## [Component] Issue Title
**Severity:** Critical/High/Medium/Low
**Environment:** Production/Staging/Dev

### Expected Behavior
What should happen

### Actual Behavior
What actually happens (with error messages)

### Steps to Reproduce
1. Step one
2. Step two
3. Observe issue

### Impact
How this affects users/business
```

**Critical Success Factors:**
- Reproducible steps (100%)
- Environment info (100%)
- Business impact stated (90%)
- Screenshots or logs (80%)
</default_to_action>

## Quick Reference Card

### Severity Levels

| Level | Definition | Examples |
|-------|------------|----------|
| **Critical** | System down, data loss, security | DB deleted, payments broken, credentials exposed |
| **High** | Major feature broken, many users | Can't checkout, search broken, dashboard fails |
| **Medium** | Partial break, workaround exists | Filter broken (refresh works), slow export |
| **Low** | Cosmetic, rare edge case | Button wraps on mobile, tooltip wrong color |

### Title Formula
❌ Bad: "Checkout broken"
✅ Good: "Payment fails with Visa cards when order total > $1000"

**Pattern:** `[Component] fails [Condition] causing [Impact]`

---

## Essential Information

### Environment Details
```
Browser: Chrome 120.0.6099.109 (Windows)
OS: Windows 11 Pro
URL: https://example.com/checkout
Date/Time: 2025-10-17 14:23 UTC
User: [email protected] (ID: 12345)
Request ID: abc-123-def-456
```

### Supporting Evidence

**Error Messages:**
```json
{
  "error": "Payment service unavailable",
  "code": "GATEWAY_TIMEOUT",
  "requestId": "abc-123-def-456"
}
```

**Console Logs:**
```
[ERROR] PaymentGateway: Connection timeout after 30000ms
  at PaymentGateway.charge (gateway.js:145)
```

---

## Example: Excellent Bug Report

```markdown
## [Checkout] Payment processing times out for orders > $1000

**Severity:** High
**Environment:** Production
**Affected Users:** ~15% of premium purchases

### Expected Behavior
Payment completes within 5 seconds regardless of amount.

### Actual Behavior
For orders above $1000, payment gateway times out after 30 seconds.
User sees "Payment failed" error. Order not created.

### Steps to Reproduce
1. Add items totaling $1,050 to cart
2. Proceed to checkout
3. Enter payment: Visa 4532 1234 5678 9010
4. Click "Place Order"
5. Wait 30+ seconds
6. Observe timeout error

### Environment
- Browser: Chrome 120 (Windows 11)
- User: [email protected]
- Request ID: abc-123-def-456

### Evidence
Console error: `PaymentGateway timeout: 30000ms exceeded`
Network: /api/checkout: 30.14s (timeout)

### Impact
- Lost revenue: ~$15K/week from failed orders
- 23 support tickets this week
- Affects 15% of orders over $1000

### Additional Context
Started after Oct 15 deployment (v2.3.0)
Possibly related to PR #456 (fraud check)
```

---

## Anti-Patterns

| ❌ Bad | Problem | ✅ Good |
|--------|---------|--------|
| "Checkout is broken" | What doesn't work? | "Payment button doesn't respond when clicked" |
| "I saw an error" | No reproduction steps | Full steps with conditions |
| "Page loads slowly" | No specifics | "Dashboard takes 12s to load (should be <3s)" |
| Multiple bugs in one | Can't track separately | One report per bug |

---

## Agent Integration

```typescript
// Automated bug triage
const triage = await Task("Triage Bug", {
  title: 'Payment fails for orders > $1000',
  description: bugDescription,
  steps: reproductionSteps
}, "qe-quality-analyzer");

// Returns: { severity, priority, component, suggestedAssignee, relatedIssues }

// Duplicate detection
const dupeCheck = await Task("Check Duplicates", {
  bugReport: newBug,
  similarityThreshold: 0.85
}, "qe-quality-analyzer");

// Bug report enhancement
const enhanced = await Task("Enhance Report", {
  originalReport: userSubmittedBug,
  addMissingInfo: true,
  identifyRootCause: true
}, "qe-production-intelligence");
```

---

## Agent Coordination Hints

### Memory Namespace
```
aqe/bug-reports/
├── triaged/*          - Bug triage results
├── duplicates/*       - Duplicate detection
├── patterns/*         - Recurring bug patterns
└── root-cause/*       - Root cause analyses
```

### Fleet Coordination
```typescript
const bugFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
  strategy: 'bug-investigation',
  agents: [
    'qe-quality-analyzer',        // Triage and categorize
    'qe-flaky-test-hunter',       // Check if test-related
    'qe-production-intelligence'  // Check production logs
  ],
  topology: 'parallel'
});
```

---

## Related Skills
- [technical-writing](../technical-writing/) - Clear bug documentation
- [exploratory-testing-advanced](../exploratory-testing-advanced/) - Finding bugs
- [sherlock-review](../sherlock-review/) - Root cause investigation

---

## Remember

Your bug report is the starting point for someone else's work. Make it **complete** (all info needed), **clear** (anyone can follow), **concise** (no noise), and **actionable** (developer knows next step).

**Good bug reports = Faster fixes = Better product = Happier users**