bug-reporting-excellence
This skill provides a structured template and guidelines for writing effective bug reports. It includes specific title formulas, severity definitions, required information fields, and concrete examples. The skill integrates with quality analysis agents for automated triage and duplicate detection.
Packaged view
This page reorganizes the original catalog entry around fit, installability, and workflow context first. The original raw source lives below.
Install command
npx @skill-hub/cli install proffesor-for-testing-agentic-qe-bug-reporting-excellence
Repository
Skill path: .claude/skills/bug-reporting-excellence
This skill provides a structured template and guidelines for writing effective bug reports. It includes specific title formulas, severity definitions, required information fields, and concrete examples. The skill integrates with quality analysis agents for automated triage and duplicate detection.
Open repositoryBest for
Primary workflow: Write Technical Docs.
Technical facets: Tech Writer, Full Stack, Testing.
Target audience: Quality engineers, testers, developers, and product managers who need to report or triage software defects.
License: Unknown.
Original source
Catalog source: SkillHub Club.
Repository owner: proffesor-for-testing.
This is still a mirrored public skill entry. Review the repository before installing into production workflows.
What it helps with
- Install bug-reporting-excellence into Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode workflows
- Review https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe before adding bug-reporting-excellence to shared team environments
- Use bug-reporting-excellence for communication workflows
Works across
Favorites: 0.
Sub-skills: 0.
Aggregator: No.
Original source / Raw SKILL.md
--- name: bug-reporting-excellence description: "Write high-quality bug reports that get fixed quickly. Use when reporting bugs, training teams on bug reporting, or establishing bug report standards." category: quality-communication priority: high tokenEstimate: 900 agents: [qe-quality-analyzer, qe-production-intelligence, qe-flaky-test-hunter] implementation_status: optimized optimization_version: 1.0 last_optimized: 2025-12-03 dependencies: [] quick_reference_card: true tags: [bugs, reporting, communication, triage, quality] --- # Bug Reporting Excellence <default_to_action> When reporting bugs: 1. TITLE: `[Component] fails [Condition] causing [Impact]` 2. DESCRIBE: Expected behavior → Actual behavior → Steps to reproduce 3. INCLUDE: Environment, severity, screenshots/logs, business impact 4. ISOLATE: Narrow down conditions (browser, user, amount thresholds) 5. ONE BUG = ONE REPORT (don't combine issues) **Bug Report Formula:** ```markdown ## [Component] Issue Title **Severity:** Critical/High/Medium/Low **Environment:** Production/Staging/Dev ### Expected Behavior What should happen ### Actual Behavior What actually happens (with error messages) ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Step one 2. Step two 3. Observe issue ### Impact How this affects users/business ``` **Critical Success Factors:** - Reproducible steps (100%) - Environment info (100%) - Business impact stated (90%) - Screenshots or logs (80%) </default_to_action> ## Quick Reference Card ### Severity Levels | Level | Definition | Examples | |-------|------------|----------| | **Critical** | System down, data loss, security | DB deleted, payments broken, credentials exposed | | **High** | Major feature broken, many users | Can't checkout, search broken, dashboard fails | | **Medium** | Partial break, workaround exists | Filter broken (refresh works), slow export | | **Low** | Cosmetic, rare edge case | Button wraps on mobile, tooltip wrong color | ### Title Formula ❌ Bad: "Checkout broken" ✅ Good: "Payment fails with Visa cards when order total > $1000" **Pattern:** `[Component] fails [Condition] causing [Impact]` --- ## Essential Information ### Environment Details ``` Browser: Chrome 120.0.6099.109 (Windows) OS: Windows 11 Pro URL: https://example.com/checkout Date/Time: 2025-10-17 14:23 UTC User: [email protected] (ID: 12345) Request ID: abc-123-def-456 ``` ### Supporting Evidence **Error Messages:** ```json { "error": "Payment service unavailable", "code": "GATEWAY_TIMEOUT", "requestId": "abc-123-def-456" } ``` **Console Logs:** ``` [ERROR] PaymentGateway: Connection timeout after 30000ms at PaymentGateway.charge (gateway.js:145) ``` --- ## Example: Excellent Bug Report ```markdown ## [Checkout] Payment processing times out for orders > $1000 **Severity:** High **Environment:** Production **Affected Users:** ~15% of premium purchases ### Expected Behavior Payment completes within 5 seconds regardless of amount. ### Actual Behavior For orders above $1000, payment gateway times out after 30 seconds. User sees "Payment failed" error. Order not created. ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Add items totaling $1,050 to cart 2. Proceed to checkout 3. Enter payment: Visa 4532 1234 5678 9010 4. Click "Place Order" 5. Wait 30+ seconds 6. Observe timeout error ### Environment - Browser: Chrome 120 (Windows 11) - User: [email protected] - Request ID: abc-123-def-456 ### Evidence Console error: `PaymentGateway timeout: 30000ms exceeded` Network: /api/checkout: 30.14s (timeout) ### Impact - Lost revenue: ~$15K/week from failed orders - 23 support tickets this week - Affects 15% of orders over $1000 ### Additional Context Started after Oct 15 deployment (v2.3.0) Possibly related to PR #456 (fraud check) ``` --- ## Anti-Patterns | ❌ Bad | Problem | ✅ Good | |--------|---------|--------| | "Checkout is broken" | What doesn't work? | "Payment button doesn't respond when clicked" | | "I saw an error" | No reproduction steps | Full steps with conditions | | "Page loads slowly" | No specifics | "Dashboard takes 12s to load (should be <3s)" | | Multiple bugs in one | Can't track separately | One report per bug | --- ## Agent Integration ```typescript // Automated bug triage const triage = await Task("Triage Bug", { title: 'Payment fails for orders > $1000', description: bugDescription, steps: reproductionSteps }, "qe-quality-analyzer"); // Returns: { severity, priority, component, suggestedAssignee, relatedIssues } // Duplicate detection const dupeCheck = await Task("Check Duplicates", { bugReport: newBug, similarityThreshold: 0.85 }, "qe-quality-analyzer"); // Bug report enhancement const enhanced = await Task("Enhance Report", { originalReport: userSubmittedBug, addMissingInfo: true, identifyRootCause: true }, "qe-production-intelligence"); ``` --- ## Agent Coordination Hints ### Memory Namespace ``` aqe/bug-reports/ ├── triaged/* - Bug triage results ├── duplicates/* - Duplicate detection ├── patterns/* - Recurring bug patterns └── root-cause/* - Root cause analyses ``` ### Fleet Coordination ```typescript const bugFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({ strategy: 'bug-investigation', agents: [ 'qe-quality-analyzer', // Triage and categorize 'qe-flaky-test-hunter', // Check if test-related 'qe-production-intelligence' // Check production logs ], topology: 'parallel' }); ``` --- ## Related Skills - [technical-writing](../technical-writing/) - Clear bug documentation - [exploratory-testing-advanced](../exploratory-testing-advanced/) - Finding bugs - [sherlock-review](../sherlock-review/) - Root cause investigation --- ## Remember Your bug report is the starting point for someone else's work. Make it **complete** (all info needed), **clear** (anyone can follow), **concise** (no noise), and **actionable** (developer knows next step). **Good bug reports = Faster fixes = Better product = Happier users**