Parallel Investigation
Coordinate multiple investigation threads for complex problems
Packaged view
This page reorganizes the original catalog entry around fit, installability, and workflow context first. The original raw source lives below.
Install command
npx @skill-hub/cli install rohitg00-skillkit-parallel-investigation
Repository
Skill path: packages/core/src/methodology/packs/collaboration/parallel-investigation
Coordinate multiple investigation threads for complex problems
Open repositoryBest for
Primary workflow: Ship Full Stack.
Technical facets: Full Stack.
Target audience: everyone.
License: Unknown.
Original source
Catalog source: SkillHub Club.
Repository owner: rohitg00.
This is still a mirrored public skill entry. Review the repository before installing into production workflows.
What it helps with
- Install Parallel Investigation into Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode workflows
- Review https://github.com/rohitg00/skillkit before adding Parallel Investigation to shared team environments
- Use Parallel Investigation for development workflows
Works across
Favorites: 0.
Sub-skills: 0.
Aggregator: No.
Original source / Raw SKILL.md
---
name: Parallel Investigation
description: Coordinate multiple investigation threads for complex problems
version: 1.0.0
triggers:
- investigate in parallel
- multiple approaches
- divide investigation
- complex problem
- explore options
tags:
- collaboration
- investigation
- parallel
- problem-solving
difficulty: advanced
estimatedTime: 15
relatedSkills:
- debugging/root-cause-analysis
- collaboration/handoff-protocols
---
# Parallel Investigation
You are coordinating parallel investigation threads to explore multiple hypotheses or approaches simultaneously. This is effective for complex problems where the root cause is unclear.
## Core Principle
**When uncertain, explore multiple paths in parallel. Converge when evidence points to an answer.**
Parallel investigation reduces time-to-solution for complex problems by eliminating serial bottlenecks.
## When to Use Parallel Investigation
Use this methodology when:
- Root cause is unknown with multiple plausible theories
- Problem is complex with many interacting components
- Time pressure requires faster resolution
- Multiple team members are available
- Initial investigation hasn't narrowed down the cause
Don't use when:
- Problem is straightforward
- Only one likely cause
- Resources are constrained
## Investigation Structure
### Phase 1: Problem Decomposition
Break the problem into independent investigation threads:
```
Problem: API responses are slow
Investigation Threads:
├── Thread A: Database performance
│ └── Check slow queries, indexes, connection pool
├── Thread B: Application code
│ └── Profile endpoint handlers, check for N+1
├── Thread C: Infrastructure
│ └── Check CPU, memory, network latency
└── Thread D: External services
└── Check third-party API response times
```
Each thread should be:
- Independent (can be investigated without blocking others)
- Focused (clear scope and success criteria)
- Time-boxed (defined duration before sync)
### Phase 2: Thread Assignment
Assign threads with clear ownership:
```markdown
## Thread A: Database Performance
**Investigator:** [Name/Agent A]
**Duration:** 30 minutes
**Scope:**
- Query execution times
- Index utilization
- Connection pool metrics
**Report Format:** Summary + evidence
## Thread B: Application Code
**Investigator:** [Name/Agent B]
...
```
### Phase 3: Parallel Execution
Each thread follows this pattern:
```
1. Gather evidence specific to thread scope
2. Document findings as you go
3. Identify if thread is leading to answer or dead end
4. Prepare summary for sync point
```
**Thread Log Template:**
```markdown
## Thread: [Name]
**Start:** [Time]
### Findings
- [Timestamp] [Finding 1]
- [Timestamp] [Finding 2]
### Evidence
- [Screenshot/Log/Metric]
### Preliminary Conclusion
[What this thread suggests about the problem]
```
### Phase 4: Sync Points
Regular convergence to share findings:
```
Sync Point Agenda:
1. Thread A report (2 min)
2. Thread B report (2 min)
3. Thread C report (2 min)
4. Thread D report (2 min)
5. Discussion & correlation (5 min)
6. Decision: Continue, pivot, or converge (3 min)
```
**Sync Point Decisions:**
- **Continue**: Threads are progressing, continue parallel
- **Pivot**: Redirect threads based on new evidence
- **Converge**: One thread found the answer, others join
### Phase 5: Convergence
When a thread identifies the likely cause:
1. **Validate** - Other threads verify the finding
2. **Deep dive** - Focused investigation on identified cause
3. **Document** - Compile findings from all threads
## Coordination Patterns
### Hub and Spoke
One coordinator, multiple investigators:
```
┌─────────┐
│ Hub │
│(Coord) │
└────┬────┘
│
┌────────┼────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌───────┐┌───────┐┌───────┐
│Thread ││Thread ││Thread │
│ A ││ B ││ C │
└───────┘└───────┘└───────┘
```
Coordinator responsibilities:
- Assigns threads
- Tracks progress
- Calls sync points
- Makes convergence decisions
### Peer Network
Equal investigators sharing findings:
```
┌───────┐ ┌───────┐
│Thread │◄───▶│Thread │
│ A │ │ B │
└───┬───┘ └───┬───┘
│ │
▼ ▼
◄─────────────►
Shared
Channel
```
Each investigator:
- Posts findings to shared channel
- Reviews others' findings
- Volunteers to converge when pattern emerges
## Communication Protocol
### During Investigation
```
[Thread A] [Status] Starting query analysis
[Thread B] [Finding] No N+1 patterns in user endpoint
[Thread A] [Finding] Slow query: SELECT * FROM orders WHERE...
[Thread C] [Dead End] CPU and memory within normal
[Thread A] [Hot Lead] Missing index on orders.user_id
```
### At Sync Point
```markdown
## Thread A Summary
**Status:** Hot Lead
**Key Finding:** Missing index on orders.user_id
**Evidence:** Query taking 3.2s, explain shows table scan
**Recommendation:** This is likely the cause, suggest converge
```
## Decision Framework
At each sync point:
| Thread Status | Action |
|---------------|--------|
| All exploring | Continue parallel |
| One hot lead | Validate lead, others support |
| Multiple leads | Prioritize by evidence strength |
| All dead ends | Reframe problem, new threads |
| Confirmed cause | Converge, begin fix |
## Time Management
```
Hour 1:
├── 0:00 - Problem decomposition
├── 0:10 - Thread assignment
├── 0:15 - Parallel investigation begins
├── 0:45 - Sync point #1
├── 0:50 - Continue/pivot/converge decision
Hour 2 (if needed):
├── 1:00 - Continue investigation
├── 1:30 - Sync point #2
├── 1:35 - Final convergence
```
## Documentation
### Final Report Structure
```markdown
# Investigation: [Problem]
## Summary
[Brief description and resolution]
## Threads Explored
### Thread A: [Area]
- Investigator: [Name]
- Findings: [Summary]
- Outcome: [Lead/Dead End/Root Cause]
### Thread B: [Area]
...
## Root Cause
[Detailed explanation of what was found]
## Evidence
- [Evidence 1]
- [Evidence 2]
## Resolution
[What was done to fix]
## Lessons Learned
- [Learning 1]
- [Learning 2]
```
## Integration with Other Skills
- **debugging/root-cause-analysis**: Each thread follows RCA principles
- **debugging/hypothesis-testing**: Threads test specific hypotheses
- **handoff-protocols**: When passing thread to another person