Back to skills
SkillHub ClubShip Full StackFull StackTesting

tdd-bug-fix

Fix bugs using red-green-refactor — reproduce the bug as a failing test first, then fix it. Use when fixing bugs to ensure they never regress.

Packaged view

This page reorganizes the original catalog entry around fit, installability, and workflow context first. The original raw source lives below.

Stars
101
Hot score
94
Updated
March 20, 2026
Overall rating
C2.7
Composite score
2.7
Best-practice grade
S96.0

Install command

npx @skill-hub/cli install rshankras-claude-code-apple-skills-tdd-bug-fix

Repository

rshankras/claude-code-apple-skills

Skill path: skills/testing/tdd-bug-fix

Fix bugs using red-green-refactor — reproduce the bug as a failing test first, then fix it. Use when fixing bugs to ensure they never regress.

Open repository

Best for

Primary workflow: Ship Full Stack.

Technical facets: Full Stack, Testing.

Target audience: everyone.

License: Unknown.

Original source

Catalog source: SkillHub Club.

Repository owner: rshankras.

This is still a mirrored public skill entry. Review the repository before installing into production workflows.

What it helps with

  • Install tdd-bug-fix into Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode workflows
  • Review https://github.com/rshankras/claude-code-apple-skills before adding tdd-bug-fix to shared team environments
  • Use tdd-bug-fix for development workflows

Works across

Claude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLIOpenCode

Favorites: 0.

Sub-skills: 0.

Aggregator: No.

Original source / Raw SKILL.md

---
name: tdd-bug-fix
description: Fix bugs using red-green-refactor — reproduce the bug as a failing test first, then fix it. Use when fixing bugs to ensure they never regress.
allowed-tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash, AskUserQuestion]
---

# TDD Bug Fix

Fix bugs the right way: reproduce first, fix second, verify always. Especially critical when using AI to generate fixes — the test ensures the AI actually solved the problem.

## When This Skill Activates

Use this skill when the user:
- Reports a bug and wants it fixed
- Says "this is broken" or "this doesn't work"
- Asks to "fix and add a test" or "fix with TDD"
- Wants to ensure a bug doesn't come back
- Is skeptical of AI-generated fixes ("how do I know it's actually fixed?")

## Why TDD for Bug Fixes

```
Without TDD:           With TDD:
Bug reported           Bug reported
  → AI generates fix     → Write failing test (RED)
  → Deploy               → AI generates fix (GREEN)
  → Hope it works        → Test passes — confirmed fixed
  → Bug returns later    → Test prevents regression forever
```

## Process

### Phase 1: Understand the Bug

Gather information:

1. **What's the expected behavior?**
2. **What's the actual behavior?**
3. **Steps to reproduce?**
4. **Which code is involved?**

```
Grep: "[relevant keyword]" to find the source
Read: the suspected file(s)
```

Identify:
- [ ] The function/method where the bug lives
- [ ] The input that triggers the bug
- [ ] The incorrect output/behavior
- [ ] The correct expected output/behavior

### Phase 2: RED — Write the Failing Test

Write a test that **fails because of the bug**. This proves the bug exists.

#### Template: Logic Bug

```swift
import Testing
@testable import YourApp

@Suite("Bug Fix: [Brief description]")
struct BugFix_DescriptionTests {

    @Test("should [expected behavior] — was [actual behavior]")
    func reproduceBug() {
        // Arrange — set up the conditions that trigger the bug
        let calculator = PriceCalculator()

        // Act — perform the operation that's broken
        let result = calculator.applyDiscount(price: 100, percent: 50)

        // Assert — what it SHOULD return (this will FAIL now)
        #expect(result == 50.0)  // Currently returns 0.5 (bug: divides by 100 twice)
    }
}
```

#### Template: Async Bug

```swift
@Test("should return cached items when network fails — was crashing")
func reproduceBug() async throws {
    let mockNetwork = MockNetworkClient(shouldFail: true)
    let mockCache = MockCache(items: [.sample])
    let service = DataService(network: mockNetwork, cache: mockCache)

    // This should return cached data, but currently crashes
    let items = try await service.fetchItems()

    #expect(items.count == 1)
}
```

#### Template: State Bug

```swift
@Test("should update count after deletion — was showing stale count")
func reproduceBug() {
    let manager = ItemManager()
    manager.addItem(Item(title: "Test"))

    manager.deleteItem(at: 0)

    #expect(manager.count == 0)     // Currently still returns 1
    #expect(manager.items.isEmpty)  // Currently still contains item
}
```

#### Template: Edge Case Bug

```swift
@Test("should handle empty input — was crashing with index out of range")
func reproduceBug() {
    let parser = CSVParser()

    // This crashes with empty string
    let result = parser.parse("")

    #expect(result.rows.isEmpty)
    #expect(result.columns.isEmpty)
}
```

#### Template: UI State Bug

```swift
@Test("should show error state when API fails — was showing infinite spinner")
func reproduceBug() async {
    let failingAPI = MockAPI(shouldFail: true)
    let viewModel = ListViewModel(api: failingAPI)

    await viewModel.loadData()

    #expect(viewModel.state == .error)  // Currently stuck on .loading
    #expect(viewModel.isLoading == false)
}
```

**Run the test — it MUST fail.** If it passes, you haven't reproduced the bug.

```bash
xcodebuild test -scheme YourApp \
  -only-testing "YourAppTests/BugFix_DescriptionTests"
```

### Phase 3: GREEN — Fix the Bug

Now fix the code to make the test pass. The fix should be **minimal** — only change what's needed.

#### Fix Guidelines

- **Change as little code as possible** to make the test pass
- **Don't refactor while fixing** — that's the next step
- **Don't fix other issues** you notice — file them separately
- **AI should target the specific test** — give Claude the failing test as context

```
Prompt to Claude: "Here's a failing test that reproduces a bug.
Fix the source code to make this test pass without breaking
any existing tests."
```

**Run the test — it MUST pass now.**

```bash
# Run the bug fix test
xcodebuild test -scheme YourApp \
  -only-testing "YourAppTests/BugFix_DescriptionTests"

# Run ALL tests to check for regressions
xcodebuild test -scheme YourApp
```

### Phase 4: REFACTOR (Optional)

If the fix introduced duplication or the code could be cleaner:

1. **Refactor only with all tests passing**
2. **Run tests after each change**
3. **Keep the bug fix test** — it's now a permanent regression test

### Phase 5: Verify Completeness

Checklist before marking the bug as fixed:

- [ ] Failing test written that reproduces the bug
- [ ] Fix implemented — test now passes
- [ ] All existing tests still pass (no regressions)
- [ ] Edge cases covered (empty, nil, boundary values)
- [ ] Test is clearly named and documents the bug
- [ ] Fix is minimal — no unrelated changes

## Multiple Related Bugs

If a bug has multiple symptoms, write multiple tests:

```swift
@Suite("Bug Fix: Discount calculation errors")
struct BugFix_DiscountCalculationTests {

    @Test("50% discount on $100 should be $50")
    func fiftyPercentDiscount() {
        let calc = PriceCalculator()
        #expect(calc.applyDiscount(price: 100, percent: 50) == 50.0)
    }

    @Test("0% discount should return original price")
    func zeroDiscount() {
        let calc = PriceCalculator()
        #expect(calc.applyDiscount(price: 100, percent: 0) == 100.0)
    }

    @Test("100% discount should return 0")
    func fullDiscount() {
        let calc = PriceCalculator()
        #expect(calc.applyDiscount(price: 100, percent: 100) == 0.0)
    }

    @Test("discount on $0 should return $0")
    func zeroPrice() {
        let calc = PriceCalculator()
        #expect(calc.applyDiscount(price: 0, percent: 50) == 0.0)
    }
}
```

## Output Format

```markdown
## Bug Fix: [Description]

### Bug Summary
- **Expected**: [What should happen]
- **Actual**: [What was happening]
- **Root cause**: [Why it was broken]

### Test (RED)
```swift
// Failing test that reproduces the bug
```

### Fix (GREEN)
**File**: `path/to/file.swift:XX`
```swift
// Before (buggy)
// After (fixed)
```

### Verification
- [x] Bug test fails before fix
- [x] Bug test passes after fix
- [x] All existing tests still pass
- [x] Edge cases covered: [list]

### Regression Prevention
Test added: `Tests/BugFixes/BugFix_DescriptionTests.swift`
This test will catch any future regression of this bug.
```

## Common Pitfalls

| Pitfall | Problem | Solution |
|---------|---------|----------|
| Test passes before fix | You didn't reproduce the bug | Make assertions more specific |
| Fix breaks other tests | Fix was too broad | Revert and use smaller, targeted change |
| Test is too specific | Brittle, breaks on unrelated changes | Test behavior, not implementation details |
| Skipping the red step | No proof the test catches the bug | Always verify test fails first |
| Fixing multiple bugs at once | Can't isolate regressions | One bug = one test + one fix |

## References

- `testing/tdd-feature/` — for new features (not bug fixes)
- `testing/characterization-test-generator/` — for capturing existing behavior first
- `generators/test-generator/` — for general test generation
tdd-bug-fix | SkillHub