Back to skills
SkillHub ClubWrite Technical DocsFull StackFrontendBackend

mcaf-testing

Add or update automated tests for a change (bugfix, feature, refactor) using the repository’s testing rules in `AGENTS.md`. Use TDD where applicable; derive scenarios from docs/Features/* and ADR invariants; prefer stable integration/API/UI tests, run build before tests, and verify meaningful assertions for happy/negative/edge cases.

Packaged view

This page reorganizes the original catalog entry around fit, installability, and workflow context first. The original raw source lives below.

Stars
18
Hot score
87
Updated
March 20, 2026
Overall rating
C1.7
Composite score
1.7
Best-practice grade
B77.6

Install command

npx @skill-hub/cli install zendevve-opentweak-mcaf-testing

Repository

Zendevve/opentweak

Skill path: .codex/skills/mcaf-testing

Add or update automated tests for a change (bugfix, feature, refactor) using the repository’s testing rules in `AGENTS.md`. Use TDD where applicable; derive scenarios from docs/Features/* and ADR invariants; prefer stable integration/API/UI tests, run build before tests, and verify meaningful assertions for happy/negative/edge cases.

Open repository

Best for

Primary workflow: Write Technical Docs.

Technical facets: Full Stack, Frontend, Backend, Tech Writer, Testing, Integration.

Target audience: everyone.

License: Unknown.

Original source

Catalog source: SkillHub Club.

Repository owner: Zendevve.

This is still a mirrored public skill entry. Review the repository before installing into production workflows.

What it helps with

  • Install mcaf-testing into Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode workflows
  • Review https://github.com/Zendevve/opentweak before adding mcaf-testing to shared team environments
  • Use mcaf-testing for development workflows

Works across

Claude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLIOpenCode

Favorites: 0.

Sub-skills: 0.

Aggregator: No.

Original source / Raw SKILL.md

---
name: mcaf-testing
description: "Add or update automated tests for a change (bugfix, feature, refactor) using the repository’s testing rules in `AGENTS.md`. Use TDD where applicable; derive scenarios from docs/Features/* and ADR invariants; prefer stable integration/API/UI tests, run build before tests, and verify meaningful assertions for happy/negative/edge cases."
compatibility: "Requires the repository’s build/test tooling; uses commands from AGENTS.md."
---

# MCAF: Testing

## Outputs

- New/updated automated tests that encode **documented behaviour** (happy path + negative + edge), with integration/API/UI preferred
- For new behaviour and bugfixes: tests drive the change (TDD: reproduce/specify → test fails → implement → test passes)
- Updated verification sections in relevant docs (`docs/Features/*`, `docs/ADR/*`) when needed (tests + commands must match reality)
- Evidence of verification: commands run (`build`/`test`/`coverage`/`analyze`) + result + the report/artifact path written by the tool (when applicable)

## Workflow

1. Read `AGENTS.md`:
   - commands: `build`, `test`, `format`, `analyze`, and the repo’s coverage path (either a dedicated `coverage` command or a `test` command that generates coverage)
   - testing rules (levels, mocks policy, suites to run, containers, etc.)
2. Start from the docs that define behaviour (no guessing):
   - `docs/Features/*` for user/system flows and business rules
   - `docs/ADR/*` for architectural decisions and invariants that must remain true
   - if the docs are missing/contradict, fix the docs first (or write a minimal spec + test plan in the task/PR)
   - follow `AGENTS.md` scoping rules (Architecture map → relevant docs → relevant module code; avoid repo-wide scanning)
3. Follow `AGENTS.md` verification timing (optimize time + tokens):
   - run tests/coverage only when you have a reason (changed code/tests, bug reproduction, baseline confirmation)
   - start with the smallest scope (new/changed tests), then expand to required suites
4. Define the scenarios you must prove (map them back to docs):
   - **positive** (happy path)
   - **negative** (validation/forbidden/unauthorized/error paths)
   - **edge** (limits, concurrency, retries/idempotency, time-sensitive behaviour)
   - for ADRs: test the **invariants** and the “must not happen” behaviours the decision relies on
5. Choose the highest meaningful test level:
   - prefer integration/API/UI when the behaviour crosses boundaries
   - use unit tests only when logic is isolated and higher-level coverage is impractical
6. Implement via a TDD loop (per scenario):
   - write the test first and make sure it fails for the **right reason**
   - implement the minimum change to make it pass
   - refactor safely (keep tests green)
7. Write tests that assert outcomes (not “it runs”):
   - assert returned values/responses
   - assert DB state / emitted events / observable side effects
   - include negative and edge cases when relevant
8. Keep tests stable (treat flakiness as a bug):
   - deterministic data/fixtures, no hidden dependencies
   - avoid `sleep`-based timing; prefer “wait until condition”/polling with a timeout
   - keep test setup/teardown reliable (reset state between tests)
9. Coverage (follow `AGENTS.md`, optimize time/tokens):
   - run coverage only if it’s part of the repo’s required verification path or if you need it to find gaps
   - run coverage once per change (it is heavier than tests)
   - capture where the report/artifacts were written (path, summary) if generated
10. If the repo has UI:
   - run UI/E2E tests
   - inspect screenshots/videos/traces produced by the runner for failures and obvious UI regressions
11. Run verification in layers (as required by `AGENTS.md`):
   - new/changed tests first
   - then the related suite
   - then broader regressions if required
   - run `analyze` if required
12. Keep docs and skills consistent:
   - ensure `docs/Features/*` and `docs/ADR/*` verification sections point to the real tests and real commands
   - if you change test/coverage commands or rules, update `AGENTS.md` and this skill in the same PR

## Guardrails

- All test discipline and prohibitions come from `AGENTS.md`. Do not contradict it in this skill.
mcaf-testing | SkillHub